<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Garth Koyle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garthkoyle.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com</link>
	<description>Administering the Business of Healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on American Hospitals Receive Low Patient Satisfaction (HCAHPS) Scores by Garth</title>
		<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com/healthcare/american-hospitals-low-grades-hcahps-survey-results/comment-page-1#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garthkoyle.com/?p=121#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t just take a simple average of the top box percents.  Those percents are the ratio of respondents&#039; answers to each question and it wouldn&#039;t make sense to average those numbers.

These HCAHPS scores were derived by first assigning each possible survey response a numerical value. The following are the values assigned to the possible responses:

Patients who gave a rating of 6 or lower (low) = 6 points
Patients who gave a rating of 7 or 8 (medium) = 8 points
Patients who gave a rating of 9 or 10 (high) = 10 points
Always = 10 points
Usually = 5 points
Sometimes or Never = 0 points
Yes (Yes Definitely) = 10 points
Yes (Yes Probably) = 5 points
No = 0 points

The percentage of responses (given in the HCAHPS data) for each possible answer is then multiplied by the point value/multiple per answer. The answer scores are then summed per question. That summed value is then multiplied by 10 to put the score on a common 100 point (100%) scale. 

Here’s an example:
Survey Question: How often did staff explain about medicines before giving them to patients?

Responses, Point Value Multiple * Answer Percentage:
Staff always explained, 10* 57% = 5.7
Staff usually explained, 5*22% = 1.1
Staff sometimes or never explained, 0 * 22% = 0
Sum = 5.7 + 1.1 + 0.0 = 6.8

Multiply that question sum by 10 to get to the 100 point (percentage) scale: 6.8*10 = 68.0

Each question is then summed and an average is given per state.

You’ll notice that a lot of the answers to questions have ranges (e.g. 0-6), but I give the state the benefit of receiving a 6. I mention this because the average response for that question is probably not the full 6 points, so these state averages might even be a little lower than reported.

I did a little more research and found that Sarasota Memorial’s average is 79.07. That average is above the Florida average (75.40) but below the national average (80.23).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t just take a simple average of the top box percents.  Those percents are the ratio of respondents&#8217; answers to each question and it wouldn&#8217;t make sense to average those numbers.</p>
<p>These HCAHPS scores were derived by first assigning each possible survey response a numerical value. The following are the values assigned to the possible responses:</p>
<p>Patients who gave a rating of 6 or lower (low) = 6 points<br />
Patients who gave a rating of 7 or 8 (medium) = 8 points<br />
Patients who gave a rating of 9 or 10 (high) = 10 points<br />
Always = 10 points<br />
Usually = 5 points<br />
Sometimes or Never = 0 points<br />
Yes (Yes Definitely) = 10 points<br />
Yes (Yes Probably) = 5 points<br />
No = 0 points</p>
<p>The percentage of responses (given in the HCAHPS data) for each possible answer is then multiplied by the point value/multiple per answer. The answer scores are then summed per question. That summed value is then multiplied by 10 to put the score on a common 100 point (100%) scale. </p>
<p>Here’s an example:<br />
Survey Question: How often did staff explain about medicines before giving them to patients?</p>
<p>Responses, Point Value Multiple * Answer Percentage:<br />
Staff always explained, 10* 57% = 5.7<br />
Staff usually explained, 5*22% = 1.1<br />
Staff sometimes or never explained, 0 * 22% = 0<br />
Sum = 5.7 + 1.1 + 0.0 = 6.8</p>
<p>Multiply that question sum by 10 to get to the 100 point (percentage) scale: 6.8*10 = 68.0</p>
<p>Each question is then summed and an average is given per state.</p>
<p>You’ll notice that a lot of the answers to questions have ranges (e.g. 0-6), but I give the state the benefit of receiving a 6. I mention this because the average response for that question is probably not the full 6 points, so these state averages might even be a little lower than reported.</p>
<p>I did a little more research and found that Sarasota Memorial’s average is 79.07. That average is above the Florida average (75.40) but below the national average (80.23).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Hospitals Receive Low Patient Satisfaction (HCAHPS) Scores by Shawn Halls</title>
		<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com/healthcare/american-hospitals-low-grades-hcahps-survey-results/comment-page-1#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Halls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garthkoyle.com/?p=121#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Can you please share how you got these averages?  when I average the top box percents for April 2008-March 2009 for the 10 areas mentioned above, I dont get the same national (80.2) or Florida average (75.4).  What am I missing? 

thanks...shawn 
twitter: @smhcs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please share how you got these averages?  when I average the top box percents for April 2008-March 2009 for the 10 areas mentioned above, I dont get the same national (80.2) or Florida average (75.4).  What am I missing? </p>
<p>thanks&#8230;shawn<br />
twitter: @smhcs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Utah Innovative Company Index &#8211; Feb by Utah ski resort</title>
		<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com/analytics/innovative-utah-companies/comment-page-1#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah ski resort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garthkoyle.com/marketing/innovative-utah-companies#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be nice to appear in your list))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be nice to appear in your list))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Utah Innovative Company Index &#8211; Feb by Bryan Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com/analytics/innovative-utah-companies/comment-page-1#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garthkoyle.com/marketing/innovative-utah-companies#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>Hey Garth - Great list!  Very interesting results, it will be fun to track.  Did you consider adding OrangeSoda.com to your list?  We&#039;re a quickly growing Internet Marketing company out of Orem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Garth &#8211; Great list!  Very interesting results, it will be fun to track.  Did you consider adding OrangeSoda.com to your list?  We&#8217;re a quickly growing Internet Marketing company out of Orem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Utah Company Index &#8211; March by csnowden</title>
		<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com/business/innovative-utah-company-index-march/comment-page-1#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>csnowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garthkoyle.com/?p=21#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Hey Garth, that is quite an impressive list of local companies. We have much to be proud of here in the Utah business community.

I wanted to throw another success story into the hat; a local company out of Orem called ListPipe specializes in SEO copywriting for bloggers. The ListPipe.com site is currently enjoying a relatively high Alexa rank at 330,801.

ListPipe.com has been around for about a year and is starting to focus on partnerships and growth. Hopefully they can be another shining star among the successful Utah companies you have listed.

Great work on this list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Garth, that is quite an impressive list of local companies. We have much to be proud of here in the Utah business community.</p>
<p>I wanted to throw another success story into the hat; a local company out of Orem called ListPipe specializes in SEO copywriting for bloggers. The ListPipe.com site is currently enjoying a relatively high Alexa rank at 330,801.</p>
<p>ListPipe.com has been around for about a year and is starting to focus on partnerships and growth. Hopefully they can be another shining star among the successful Utah companies you have listed.</p>
<p>Great work on this list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Google Trends to Find People Looking for Jobs, and Utah Jobs by Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.garthkoyle.com/business/using-google-trends-to-find-people-looking-for-jobs-and-utah-jobs/comment-page-1#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garthkoyle.com/business/using-google-trends-to-find-people-looking-for-jobs-and-utah-jobs#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>I heard on the radio today that Utah has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country.  Yet you showed that there is quite a lot of searching for Utah jobs.  So, this must be indicative of turnover - that is, EMPLOYED people are searching for jobs, not UNEMPLOYED people.  This could be a sign of employee dissatisfaction with their jobs.  And search the unemployment rate is so low in Utah, people can easily quit a current job and find a new one.  Utah&#039;s job market is now an &quot;Employee&#039;s Market&quot; in the same way that the housing market is a &quot;Buyer&#039;s Market&quot;.  It&#039;s the classic forces of supply v. demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard on the radio today that Utah has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country.  Yet you showed that there is quite a lot of searching for Utah jobs.  So, this must be indicative of turnover &#8211; that is, EMPLOYED people are searching for jobs, not UNEMPLOYED people.  This could be a sign of employee dissatisfaction with their jobs.  And search the unemployment rate is so low in Utah, people can easily quit a current job and find a new one.  Utah&#8217;s job market is now an &#8220;Employee&#8217;s Market&#8221; in the same way that the housing market is a &#8220;Buyer&#8217;s Market&#8221;.  It&#8217;s the classic forces of supply v. demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
